Northern Uganda needs post conflict leaders

LEADERSHIP

The members of Parliament for Northern Uganda have fired the salvo to re-ignite the debate about secession. For many years now, the idea of Northern Uganda breaking away from the Republic of Uganda has been a malignant urge. Understandably, the Northern Uganda situation is one which draws a lot of bad blood and sad memories of annihilation.

I am not very sure whether the problem of northern Uganda can effectively get resolved by cessation or federation. There are merits to both arguments; Northern Uganda is the size of Belgium and probably more endowed with natural resources. It has a vibrant community who feel that their vigor and enthusiasms are being nipped up in the bud by the violent NRM ideology. Many in Northern Uganda still believe that the NRM has held this sinister plan of transforming the North into a pool of insolvents and beggars.

The truth be said, Northern Uganda endures a deliberate marginalization and structural disadvantage as a consequence of the past twenty years. Unfortunately, this region has not been able to produce principled post conflict leaders who have a strong vision for the region. There is a belief that every situation is capable of producing its own leadership. In that aspect, this region has failed to produce such leaders.

Recent history of conflict in Northern Uganda was able to produce leaders and managers who stood by their unbroken spirits and guided the region through the genocide, afloat. The league of Hons. Reagan Okumu, Zachary Olum, Okello Okello Livingston and Hon. Norbert Mao represented strong voices for the people and they were able to stave off many ill intentions of the NRM regime against the Acholi people. Lango and West Nile sub-regions produced some of the most vibrant, reputable and consistent leaders throughout the conflict.

One of the biggest challenges that Northern Uganda has not come to terms with is the basic understanding that there is no equal place for recovery under the NRM where everyone is grabbing everything for self aggrandizement. Not that the region should produce thieves and scoundrels the type we see swindling anything called wealth. With few exceptions, the post conflict Northern Uganda has produced weak and opportunistic leaders who erroneously have been duped that the solution to the regions is with President Museveni.

Northern Uganda needs to produce a breed of post conflict leadership – a group of people who will not fight military invasion, atrocious acts of government and mass murders, but leaders who will have strong will to fight corruption, manipulation and theft of public resources from the grassroot to the national level. Given the high moral aptitude of the people from Northern Uganda, one of their failures is to look up to President Museveni and corrupted NRM system with hope for solution. Like a man who is sentenced to the guillotine, Northern Uganda is merely hoping that the noose man will empathize and set them free at a point. This is a wild expectation under this regime.

Cessation talk for now is metaphorical like the life of a seed. In that seed there is a tree and in that tree there are possibilities of many other seeds. For those conditions to fetter such that this seed of cessation can grow into a promising forest, a lot of realistic work must be done. One of such is to preserve the land and its endangered population!

It is also profitable to begin contemplating on whether creation of semi-autonomous Nile Region to demand for federal status with the Republic is a realistic idea. Further, the leadership in Northern Uganda needs to focus on developing a strong ideological framework to mobilize its “citizens” just beyond the complaint of “marginalization”. I think marginalization claims typifies a learned self-helplessness – the tendency of tendering our recovery duties to others. The false hope that the central government that is presided over by Mr. Museveni would change its mind and policies on this region we voted with euphoria.

The sordid conditions of Northern Uganda is not because people there drink alcohol, indulge in risky sexual behaviours, are lazy to the point that they are unable to hold the hoe, etc. The reverse is true. People of Northern Uganda are honorable and personable hardworking individuals emerging from two decades of war.

Their real dilemma is trying to fit into a very dangerous and meticulously scandalous world which knows no veracity, trustworthiness nor reciprocity – the world that despises them.

END

Museveni vs Besigye debate: DM and Dr Besigye won

POLITICS

The concluded debates between President Museveni and Dr Kiiza Besigye have provided insight into important aspect of our politics. It has attempted to reshape the culture of hostility to that of civility. Although the tone of President Museveni remains combative, I found that Dr. Besigye weighed in with a sense of measure and a focus on crucial political issues.

This article is a rejoinder to Mr. Timothy Kalyegira’s analysis of the debate between the two political opponents in “Assessing Museveni’s debate with Besigye”, published in the DM of February 17^th, 2013. The central premise of this article is to loud the optimism that Mr. Museveni has chosen in public discourse, in writing, and not by sending perceived opponents to jail. This gesture is indeed a departure from tradition and signs that someday, Ugandans will be able to witness a televised civil debate between Presidential contestants, a feat that our neighbouring Kenya achieved recently.

There are many ways that these debates could be assessed. Although Mr. Kalyegira in his assessment determined that both leaders handled their issues in a similar manner and accorded them draw performance. I would slightly disagree. What was very remarkable and deserves mention were the language that Mr. Museveni used and the framing of his “enemies” or “enemies of the state”.

For instance, to designate the Daily Monitor or any other media outlet that provides equal platform for expression of ideals and values as an “enemy” is both ideologically and constitutionally self defeating and diversionary.

The Daily Monitor publication has remained the most objective and non-partisan news media in Uganda. For that, it has weathered much storm but remained steadfast in providing a platform for scrutiny of societal issues at large. President Museveni has, in the last year resorted to framing any dissenting voices as charlatans, liars, enemies and so forth. These are unfortunate labeling because the public expects much from the President and they are getting little, each year.

One of the challenges of this regime is lack of transparency in sharing information. Naturally, Journalists will speculate if they suspect or become curious of any events and are denied information. Instead of calling them liars, banning their media and incarcerating the members of the fourth estate, why doesn’t NRM enact enabling policies of transparency in information sharing? This would enhance the quality of reporting and public education that are agreeable to the President and all citizens. Does it interest the President to realize that Ugandans know more about premier league soccer teams such as Manchester United, Arsenal, Chelsea etc than government affairs and NRM history?

The other paradox is the culture of denial. The NRM is a hub of deniers – group of people who lie with flat faces, because they would rather deny that face public scrutiny. Whenever they are put to task to account, the first line of defence is denial and manipulation of facts. Don’t we still remember the dramatic events that unveiled during the sham Dr. Besigye trial for fake rape and the lies of then CID, Elizabeth Kuteesa? If you want to document these lies, try to collate press releases from NRM spokespersons from 1986 and including UPDF public relations statements. These should be great sources of information for a full Masters’ thesis. Everything they say contradicts what the public knows and expect. This mindset is exactly how Mr. Museveni attempted to conceal the recruitment of his son, Muhoozi, into the army and the astronomical elevation in rank, the biased selection for military courses and training leading to his expedited leadership rise to the helm of the elite forces – leave alone the abuse of uniform explanation.

The most interesting construct that this debate gave life to, was projection. In human psychology, projection is attributing certain distasteful aspect of one’s character to others. For instance, people who lie a lot always expect that others will lie, cowards will always expect to be attacked even at peace time, so they amass enormous protection; thieves will garrison themselves in fortified homes for fear of being robbed even when they know that their property came from proceeds of corruption or theft.

This brings me to the repeated use of strong words such as charlatan, liar (lies), enemies, chauvinist, terrorists etc. The online dictionary defines “charlatan” as someone who is a quack, basically pretending to have more knowledge than s/he knows [from Cynic satirist Lucian of Samosata – “The Philosopher Charlatan” who drinks the Lether water (forgetfulness) and conducts himself exactly the opposite of what he preached earlier on]. In that rebuttal, Mr. Museveni also referred to “opinionated” individuals. Given our history and most specifically the history of NRA or its precursor, Fronasa, the entire liberation project was premised on lies and manipulation in the name of ideology of social transformation. To project these attributes on others is again self defeating because so many people in the NRMO party now know what they didn’t know back in 1980s and early 90s about their Party and its leaders.

Mr. Museveni himself has regurgitated his own words many times; he derided African leaders who over stay in power as the real problem of Africa. Recently on BBC, Mr. Museveni was reported to have said that he is too experienced to leave power after 27 years; When Multi-party elections came to play, Mr. Museveni vowed that he would serve two terms; then he wanted to consolidate his gains and later changed to “No change”. All these flip flops are the roots of evil in our society because there are no principles and truth in our leadership.

In conclusion, I believe that Dr Besigye and the Monitor newspapers were the real winners of this debate. The DM was even courageous to provide a platform for this debate considering the many false accusations including that it distorted the words of the President previously.

END

Chaos in Uganda is the function of ruling elite

PEACE/CHAOS

Most of the accolades that poured during the NRM so-called liberation celebration spoke of the NRM as the inventors of peace in Uganda. The investment in peace is not an end to itself, but a means towards stability of any community and for the common good of society. Peace should not be merely itemized and priced. Neither should it be a sub-culture experienced by a few. Peace should be part of the dominant culture and should be evenly distributed in society.

To catalogue the occurrence of peaceful situation as a political achievement or agenda is ideologically self defeating. Society naturally strives to exist in peace with itself, first and foremost. When we invest in means of coercion and continuously perpetuate violence instead of peace at various layers of society, we commit serious crime of contradiction.

Ironically, the NRM have become custodians of our peace even when they profess violent ideologies. They continue to apportion and trade peace in manners that have transformed the experience of peace as a lifelong dream for others.

For a group of people to claim custodianship of peace, does this mean that generally they are more peaceful than others and are desirous of peace than the majority of Ugandans? Doesn’t it mean that they are more chaotic by nature and are therefore capable of disrupting peace? On the flip side, would it mean that the society is generally constituted of barbaric tribal elements and individuals who are naturally chaotic? Are members of this society in such a dire strait that they must be policed heavily with Mambas, over 50,000 armed soldiers and about 50,000 members of the police force armed to the teeth?

 This article argues that the prevailing dominant ideology in our society is inherently a chaotic one whose desire is to rule by force and use peace disproportionately as a token of appeasement. It uses and relies on theory of chaos to subjugate and itemize peace. It has undressed the population of its peace veils and itemized as a politically expedient pursuit. This confirms that those who are now tendering to our peace, are actually the perpetrators of commotion that we experience.

Our traditional societies are generally peaceful and had cultural institutions that mediated social disequilibrium. Peace was the penultimate objective of these communities and every community worked hard to secure peace with its neighbours. They did this through means of reciprocity such as marriages, rites of passage, seasonal festivities, trades, funerals, community development, harvesting, local courts and so forth. These institutions were incorruptible and served to mediate social harmony, unlike the current state institutions.

The real culture of violence in our midst results from the violent nature of the ruling elite. These avaricious people repress and suppress human liberties, violate human rights, perpetuate impunity and above all function by means of corruption to retain status quo.

It is therefore worthy rejecting the thesis that NRM brought peace to the communities. Peace is irreducible, but a condition that always finds equilibrium after it has been displaced.  Peace is also embedded at every level of human discourse, depending on the experience of social space and social location; peace can mean many states of being.

If we are to explain peace as merely the absence of war or violence, then we limit ourselves enormously. Peace of the mind is above all, the most important. When the mind is unsettled, the perception of peace is displaced. In our common daily living, the lack of basic human needs provides the first sense of insecurity. When a man cannot feed himself or his dependents, then by any measure of things, such a man is not in peace with himself or his conditions.

In our situation, this form of insecurity is the biggest and most proximal threat to our peace. To solve this proximal insecurity, we do not need mambas, machine guns, teargas, jetfighter and colored poisonous liquids. The society needs to be invested in peaceful means through which production and products of labour can get equitably distributed.

To contextualize our experiences of peace we must invest in civil our mannerism. Peace is a pre-requisite for economic and social transformation. But this peace should remain a cultural competency and expectancy accepted and practiced by all, not merely a political item. The failure of this society is to assume that we can reinforce peace by coercive means. Conceptualization of peace ensues through our spaces and in real time; people must be comfortable with this process and the outcome, to enable them build social and cultural capitals out of it, in the absence of a domineering systems of chaos.

END.

Bishop Niringiye: Uganda's jails are for immortals

PRIESTLY ENDEAVORS

I was overjoyed to see the picture of Bishop Zac Niringiye emerging spiritually unscathed from Wandegeya Police post. I am no stranger to Wandegeya Police station.

As a student leader back in the late 90s and early 2000, we often posted police bonds for our colleagues who would get arrested arbitrarily from Makerere University Halls of residence or hostels for all sorts of trivial accusations.

In Uganda, prison is not used for the purpose for which it was made. Prison and confinement have been used for purposes of demoralizing the righteous people. Real hard core criminals are never kept in jail. They get bail and they remain at large.

But to even think that a very devout religious man like Bishop Niringiye can be humiliated or demoralized by confinement is a joke that is an award winning. Do Policemen really know how rigorous, both mentally and physically, the priesthood training is?

When I completed my education at Mulago, friends of mine tried to persuade me into enlisting into the Uganda Police Force. They argued that the Museveni had mooted a master plan to overhaul and transform the UPF into a vibrant, modern and efficient civil force that would have state-of-the-art equipment and modus operandi. They even convinced me that specialists like myself would get front row treatment, be accorded special treatment and commissioned at a higher rank.   

Certainly, those offers were very enticing, safe for one encounter with a colleague who is now at very high rank. He had just completed his Masters studies in international relations and enrolled into the Uganda Police. The fellow, then in his sixth month of Police training, narrated to us how they would be turned upside down, inspected thoroughly in between the legs to ensure that all was well. He described many more strenuous and rigorous physical regimes, but with less mental work. Nonetheless, I was never convinced that Police was my destiny. I value social justice, rule of law and I could not imagine serving in the NRM police, given its current public profile.

The Police training is something that cannot pass for priestly endeavors.  Priests, by nature of their training and indoctrination are people who are prepared and used to solitary confinements already. Taking them to jail and confining them only fulfills their own purpose. It is like their absolute end, a struggle for which they deliberate. True Christians are very prepared to endure all sorts of suffering and humiliation, including living in the worse conditions of poverty or standing up for a belief they hold dear. I wonder whether some members of the Uganda Police read the beatitudes in the Bible.

Now, in detaining Bishop Zac, the Police were creating something beyond their imagination. The Bishop could easily become a living saint or a Martyr as such.

Seriously, in most times, the UPF is not serious. According to the media reports, the Bishop and his associates were arrested while distributing anti-corruption pamphlets at Makerere University to students. The content of the pamphlet has long been published in many dailies and there has not been any provocation of violence.

In Uganda, it is a tradition that when the powers that be, decides to waste taxpayer’s money on junk helicopters, planes, tanks or strange military uniforms etc, journalists and media houses try to break down the waste amounts in terms of social services.

What the anti-corruption group – Black Mondays have done is not exceptional at all. What is true and very surprising is that the Police find that the anti-corruption groups are capable of inciting violence using pamphlets and not the media houses, despite of their wider audience.

The Police have abrogated the constitution and deprived Ugandans of the fundamental freedom to associate, assemble and hold free speech. These acts of impunity reflect a condescending and spiteful attitude that the regime holds against Ugandans, generally. The notion of tolerance, rule of law and democracy are pricy commodities now.

The overall implication, and something that we must fear, is that restriction of public spheres narrows both the personal and communal efficacious growth. People will still resort to violence and mob justice as means of attaining legitimate justice because they have lost faith in existing institutions.

This is my advice to Bishop Nigirinye and his troupe. The next time the police arraigns you, carry the Bible. When they begin to interrogate you, take your time to read from the bible, those passages from revelations to a corrupted world.

END

Coup talk perpetuates the culture of violence

Subculture of Violence

After the steamy week of coup talk, Ugandans appear to have accepted that this country is deficient in democratic ideals. First, the talk of coup must have been treated as a case of treason. Nonetheless, we have to be very critical of the way President Mueveni operates; his craft is the generation and use of fear. In fear, Museveni finds a tool to cow all the branches of government and bully just everyone around.

I want to argue and support the simple notion that the leadership of President Museveni is at a crisis level. Museveni knows that he is losing command over Uganda’s fragile consciousness because people now fear him less. But this is the price he has to pay for staying in power for way too long. The degree to which Ugandans simultaneously respected and feared Museveni as a war hero has waned significantly. People now see him not in the light of the revolutionist he was, but a tyrant who presides over an increasingly corrupt regime; a regime whose interests are mutually exclusive to the aspirations of Ugandans.

When you speak to many Ugandans, they feel that they have lost control over everything Ugandan. They no longer have the power ascribed to them by the constitution, nor common control of the means of production or equal status in the economy. They feel that both the military and judiciary have become more or less personalized entities and the police – a predator.

The coup threat therefore is for Museveni to beat in the increasingly free minded Parliamentarians. But it is also to reinforce the magnanimity of the NRM subculture of violence.

If Political science is the study of how political power is attained, used and sustained, then we have to also study violence. Violence studies would enable us to understand the mechanisms through which violence is produced and sustained in Uganda and the purpose for which it is produced and transformed into a culture.

Now, by any means, the NRM is a violent enterprise. Their proximal location to weapons and their monopoly on who joins or gets promoted in the army, including membership in other instruments of coercion, makes them the sole agency of violence in our society.

The renowned American criminologists Dr. Marvin E. Wolfgang and his colleague Franco Ferracuti published a seminal work in 1967 called The subculture of violence. This subculture of violence theory holds that overt use of violence generally is a reflection of basic values that stands apart from the dominant, the central or the parent culture. Although many studies have refuted the general application of this theory due to its racist focus on black youths, it appears very applicable to the NRM mentality. 

According to Wolfgang and Ferracuti, a subculture is considered to be the normative system of some group or groups, usually smaller than the whole society (1967: 97).

Given that the NRM is not an inclusive party and also given its history and narratives, their influence over the Ugandan society is mediated through violence. This is their basic ideological driver and also the dominant one as such.

This violence manifests and occupies many facets of society; directly by ostracizing individuals like Kiize Besigye or Tumukunde whom they considered to have transgressed and deviated from the norms; they assault Ugandans my dismantling the systems of society that mediate the distribution of justice and resources; and they launch always the most vicious forms of assault in our psyche when they threaten coups and return to civil war, even when such a murderous venture is uncalled for.

Over the years, Ugandans have become smarter and more communicative among themselves. Ugandans view themselves less in the mirage of ethnic groupings than oppressed, poor, powerless and dependent people. Relationships between Ugandans of all walks of life are no longer defined solely by tribes, language, and education, or past relations but poverty and uncertainty about the near future.

Museveni and his cahoots have made it obvious that they occupy every private and personal space of all Ugandans by setting on ground military boots and the most vicious and yet pathetically corrupt police whose primary objectives are no longer keeping law and order.

The function of the Uganda Police is blocking peaceful assemblies, which are provided for in the constitution and conducting political operations.

It is only in Uganda that the Police never actually respond to thieves or criminal activities in the neighborhoods, but will respond swiftly to motions made by any of the opposition leaders. 

This wanton act of repression has diminished public space but has also ordained the Uganda Police with a branding that many Ugandans will remember this regime with. It is no surprise because every regime that has desecrated Uganda has left horrifying symbols or memories etched in our subconscious.  

END

Mukula: the Insect that hoped to become a bird!!

SELECTIVE JUSTICE

In November of 1993, the famed Paris-based Congolese Musician, Koffi Olomide released a song called Papa plus. A portion of the preamble to that song has since been translated to me, from Lingala to English. In that song, Koffi warns that even when insects fly, they will never become birds. That warning, if well heeded to, prominent people like former VP, Hon. Gilbert Bukenya and Hon. Mike Mukula would not have been subjects to humiliation and selective justice of this magnitude. They were outsiders who wanted to become insiders without fully understanding the predatory NRM's nature.

Let me remind other NRM wanna-bes; even if you develop yellow wings for joining the Movement, you will only remain an insect. There are no prospects of ever becoming a yellow bird, even for crumbs clearing purposes. In other words, unless you are a member of certain clan, married to certain families, speak certain languages, been an historical, hold a gun and owe an enormous allegiance to status quo, you will remain just that – an easily disposable outsider.

Renowned researcher and advocate for anti-human trafficking, Kevin Bales, wrote a book titled: Disposable Human Beings. That book catalogues the path and troubles that trafficked women and young girls go through while in captivity. Once they arrive at their destination, mostly Scandinavian countries, the females are sold off into slavery, either for sex or hard labour. Once the girls have been used to the point of depletion, drugged, scolded, raped many times, infected with diseases and so forth, they are disposed. They become disposable human beings.

Both Hon. Mukula and Hon. Gilbert Bukenya, in the sense of Kevin Bales, represent our modern day political disposables. The fates of the two leaders symbolize the nature of the NRM politics and reaffirm my hypothesis. I long hypothesized that the NRM is a party of President Museveni and some historicals. The first generation proprietors are their children and the second generation owners will be their grandchildren. That is the given direction of the ripple and anyone else who situates himself or herself outside of those socio-political gridlocks, only gets washed on by the wave for exploitation.

When it comes to corruption, the fight is taken way too peripheral. It is the small guys who are fought, and yet this culture of impunity and immorality has been nurtured and cultivated by those situated at the crux of governance.

During Hon. Jacob Oulanya’s wedding to my sister, Ms Okot, the President was quoted in the dailies to have praised Hon. Okello Oryem, Jacob Oulanya and others as potential allies for his “great” intentions for Acholi region. The President stated that previously his rather great intentions, such as plans to usurp land and intern the people of Acholi were rebuffed by bad leadership. He went ahead to mention Joseph Kony as such leaders.

Let’s be candid to the President and again extend an olive branch to him. First, the Acholi people have related with Museveni in a very civil manner, it is the revenge attitude that Museveni carried against the Acholi which perpetuated he hostility. Second, for years, Acholi people have sent NRM representatives to work with Museveni. Most of these leaders are humiliated and disposed easily. How long did Acholi MPs occupy the Ministry of State for Sports in the Ministry of Education? I recall very well, Omony Ogaba from Aruu was the pioneer of that office which had no budget; Okello Oryem followed suit and for so long, no Acholi name featured prominent in full cabinet position.

We all recall how Acholi people loved Atuku Betty Bigome and you recall how Amuru elders were surprised that Bigombe could only become Minister of state for water. Given the above, whenever Acholi people send NRM representatives to work with the President, they send us Madvhani with his intentions to “plant” sugar canes in the most fertile soils of Amuru. We all know that Amuru has oil and minerals. We know that land in Acholi is customary land and there are clear means of acquisition that land, why the political interference?

Finally, I still remember how Permanent Secretary Opika Opoka was summarily dismissed from his docket at Ministry of Agriculture for the failures of his boss, the then VP, Hon Wandira Kazibwe to account for her imaginary dams. Had the scandals in the proportion that we see now at OPM happened when an Acholi is the PS, would he still be in office and not jail?

Given the above accounts, the President has no excuses for holding double standards on Acholi on account of hostility. Acholi people have been honest and modest with the NRM even when they were being pounded and shredded by NRM mortars in an inferno for over twenty years! Now, if the Mukula debacle does not teach us a lesson, then look around and see where Alice Kaboyo, or Mukula’s contemporaries in the money affairs of GAVI are!!

Well, when you know that you are an insect, please, do not develop unnecessary hopes of becoming also a bird, you end up a jail bird!!

END

Museveni: Our President, Our King, Our Coroner

PRINCIPLES

These days, Presidential powers know no boundaries. In Gambia, President Yahya Jammeh has claimed to have discovered potent HIV drug. In his testimony last October, Jammeh confirmed that he had cured 68 people so far and was now planning to build a huge hospital to administer his medicine to Gambians living with HIV virus.

These days, African Presidents have become something else. Either they are presiding over mass as priests or are establishing their persona through symbolism as the undefeated Kings in statues. African Presidents are the Kings and our chief coroners; some sing while others Deejay, too. President Museveni has been each or all of these and probably more. Not very long, the President of Uganda abolished priests and traditional leaders from participating in politics. The President reiterated that politics involves nasty elections. In that essence, traditional leaders and priests are not elected through universal suffrage and therefore they should remain apolitical. Period!

Many Ugandans suspected that such draconian directives were targeted at specific Kings and Priests. In particular, the Baganda accused the President of attempting to sideline the Kabaka of Buganda from mainstream politics. Cynics were quick to defend the President by pointing to the near tragic relationship between Buganda King and politicians at the advent of the so-called independence of Uganda.  The President threatened that if any cultural leader, especially the Kabaka, indulges in politics, he (the King) would be compelled to expose himself to elective processes henceforth. Figure out an elected Kabaka of Buganda in 2016!

True, traditional leaders should remain custodians to our cultural and traditional heritage. But when the government deliberately feeds off of the Kingdom’s property, uses and abuses its land and appropriates prime cultural lands for its few henchmen, then certainly a political contraction of the these cultural leaders becomes inevitable. Culture cannot be preserved outside a setting or context. Settings are defined by geographical location and within that setting must be space for cultural symbols and the environment for its preservation or evolution. This is exactly what the NRM regime has tried to winnow out and restrict the popular cultures of the native Ugandna through its capitalist expansionism. That is the hand of my President, the King!

The President also refused to let the priests indulge in politics. He stated that politics rooted in religion typifies the sectarian tendencies that post-colonial Uganda politics were organized. He warned that should priests indulge in politics, a field of his expertise, he, President Museveni would also pick up the Bible and begin to administer baptism to infants. Figure out a priest carrying AK 47, in military combat and with a Bible baptizing a child!!!On many occasions, Museveni, in the tow of his wife, presided over mass euphoria on  Decemeber 31^st  at Nambole Stadium. Museveni has not hidden his infatuation with the so-called born again Christians for whom; he continues to vest much trust. Recently, he even requested that his cadres identify more honest born again Christians to fill lucrative and prime government jobs.  That is your President, the Priest.

The mysterious demise of flamboyant NRM legislator, Cerinah Nebanda (RIP) also brought out the Physician part of the President. The President’s latest manifestation is that of a Chief Coroner in Uganda. When qualified pathologists from Parliament and Mulago decided to carry out postmortem to establish the cause of death of the MP, the NRM machinery sunk on them. The properly qualified and professional pathologists ended up in jail and discredited for carrying out their duty as required of them. The President took over and ordered tests to be carried out in the UK and Israel to establish the cause of death of the MP. That panicked response exposed the NRM’s public relations’ prowess. The President undermined the powers of the public postmortem and thought that by usurping the process, a credible and acceptable result would absolve popular suspicion. Ugandans no longer trust lab results from the UK or Israel. Those are politicized results that only expounded on the ire of the locals. Both the President and his NRM party lost a political fight in popular public opinion. That is our President, the King, and Chief Coroner!

END.