Thursday 15 September 2016

Uganda Parliament's Extravagance


POLINSENSITIVITY

This, by no means is waging of war of words with the Institution of Government called Uganda’s Parliament. This is a transmission of chronic hurt, the widely perceived feeling that the Parliament of Uganda is insensitive, ineffective and overly extravagant without proper justifications.
There are several instances where the Parliament of Uganda has failed Uganda and Ugandans. Some of the failures stem from the political history of Uganda; The low level of civic engagement, and the political environment in which it must act compounds the problems. However, the privileges and the extravagance with which these privileges are expended, leaves the public in utter awe. In essence, this Parliament appears to have abandoned its traditional roles as the primary arbitrator of how economic benefits and resources should be distributed in society.
The glaring inequalities in Ugandan society today, and the rampant breakdown of social infrastructure – healthcare, school system, income disparities etc, show how detached and unconcerned this Parliament is.
Ugandans now feel that Parliament is fused permanently with the Executive branch of government, legislates for the person of the President, and its overall agenda is increasingly becoming diabolically opposed to the common aspirations of the ordinary citizen. It has reneged on its duties to reduce socioeconomic disparities, and ameliorate the impacts of it.
The Parliament is an extension of society but acts as if it is alien, such that society owes them and must pay, transport, and bury them like Oligarchs.  In normal societies, Parliament would be concerned with mortality and work to reduce it. In Uganda, Parliament prepares for death and events it! Is this a conscious gathering or simply an aggregation of ordinary people on end-of-life mode?
The level of disenchantment is reaching a high crescendo and Ugandans are now debating whether there is relevance for Parliament at all given the cost of its sustenance and return of value.
Since 1992, Uganda accepted to liberalize its economy. Neoliberalism commands that economies open up the markets to allow for private sector players – or market forces, other than government, to arbitrate how the economy and resources are distributed. The more robust these private sector players are, the more government finds opportunity to withdraw its public role.  Minimal government role in service delivery suffices well for advanced economies. Not Uganda’s. We are suffering more from failed policies of liberal markets than benefiting because we lack competent institutions to allow for its self-regulation.
What we now see is that government has prematurely withdrawn from its primary role of financing and delivering requisite social services. The commitment to deliver services has also died. More public resources – money, is now available for political expedience, and lavished with contempt to the most insignificant sector of the economy, and to the most treacherous ends.
Where is the conscience of this Parliament that is unable to realize that Ugandans are suffering? You are a Parliament spending billions on least valuable international trips, expending millions on meaningless medals, spending trillions in buying cars (when that money could be used to kick-start the mass production of locally made energy saving Kiira eV Vehicles); and plan to spend millions on burials.
People now fight to death, sell off their properties, land, household goods; forge academic papers, etc to go to Parliament. These people do not add any value to Parliament, or enhance quality of legislation. They go there to get rich. Parliament is the place nowadays where people die for, just to get rich quick. Little wonder that there is even a lucrative funeral budget already earmarked. Such, is the tragedy of our nation.
The foregoing reality is that the Parliament of Uganda must do a self-reflection. What it does not want to do is to start comparing its privileges with that of other Parliaments, say in Kenya or the UK. That kind of thing is what Ugandans like to do. These countries have varying sizes of the economy that are robust enough and works for its people. In Uganda, MPs should actually be unpaid volunteers because nothing works.

End.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Peasantry politics and the crisis of allegiance

PEASANTRY POLITICS Recently Hon. Ojara Martin Mapenduzi dominated the national news headlines over his decision to cooperate with the Nation...