ABUSE of POWER
For a couple of years now, Hon. Beti
Olive Kamya has attempted to convince the nation that Presidential powers ought
to be tamed. Beti has recognized that the excess power vested in the President
of Uganda by the 1995 Constitution - as variedly amended - is the mainstay of
abuse of public trust. Beti appears to argue that it is the lavishing of such excessive
power in the office of the President that affords the occupant unfettered confidence
to abuse power.
Whereas Beti’s arguments seem
plausible on the surface, a critical scrutiny of it shows some cracks in the fabrics
of that belief. I am compelled to believe that the real problem with African
society is not about absolute power that is vested in its leaders; rather, it
is how that power is accumulated. It is about the way the people conceptualize
power, leadership and governance.
It is no doubt that the power that is
vested in the leaders originates from the people. Evidences are there to
illustrate that however powerful a leader maybe, if the people were to resolve
to challenge abuse of power, they would. This happened in Burkina Faso, Tunisia
and elsewhere.
A conscious population therefore, is the basis of good
governance heralded by moderate exercising of power and distribution of it.
Power in every society depends largely on the resolve and consciousness of the
masses who apportions it, regulate or normalize its use.
The Ugandan society
lacks that level of consciousness to unify against abuse of power. In fact,
some people are even contemplating whether Britain left Uganda too soon and they
would invite the British back if possible.
The challenge of exercising power in
Uganda is not any different from that in Kenya, Tanzania or Zambia. The variation
lies in the consciousness of those citizens. When you google “abuse of power in
Africa”, you will be surprised with 99,200,000 entries on that subject.
Contrast that with “abuse of power in Asia”, 71,500,000, and Latin America, 14,200,000
entries - all generating within 0.59 seconds or thereabout. Given the poor
culture of documentation in these regions, these figures may also reflect variations
in the levels of consciousness across the three least developed continents of
the world.
Suppose Beti has a point, how would
she redistribute the power effectively in Uganda where every person strives to
gain power for self perpetuation? Beti has to produce a blue-print of her
proposal for public scrutiny. For now, it’s unconvincing to assert that the excessive
Presidential powers is the major source of Uganda’s problems without
enumerating how that power is accumulated.
Under the tenure of Mr. Museveni, it
is even more challenging to effectively resolve the problems of power
redistribution because of political corruption, an ideology of perversion and
narcissism.
There is an inherent absurdity in the
fact that the Ugandan society is now fully compliant with the corruption. In
fact, the process of abuse of power begins with tribalism, favouritism and culminates
with bribe soliciting; monetary or otherwise, during elections. This act
signifies the sanctioning and normalization of corruption through which the
society subverts its own interests. Through that vice, the people relinquish
their will and with it, the power, to the “elected” individual. This makes
power tendering a lucrative deal such that an astute President, whether he is
made powerless through a constitutional amendment, will always amass power by
bribing and procuring unprincipled allegiances.
In my view, making public
administration and politics generally less attractive is the most effective way to tame
the power problem in Uganda. By lowering wages and privileges of politicians,
banning any forms of bribery during elections, and punishing those who violate electoral
rules by steep jail terms and a ban of violators from contesting in subsequent elections;
ensuring a minimum qualification of at least five years of experience in public
and/or private sectors, and instituting term/age limits for every elective
position, will certainly restore credibility to our politics.
END
No comments:
Post a Comment