Saturday 23 January 2016

Prevailing Peace in Uganda Exposes Museveni’s Anarchism



SOCIETAL VIOLENCE

One of the confusing issues for voters in this campaign is that President Museveni is solely responsible for the prevailing peace in the country. In fact, the prevailing peace has exposed Mr. Museveni’s anarchism and the tendencies to manufacture violence as means of solving problems where peaceful means could suffice. Through violence, Museveni has been able to manufacture consent of unsuspecting voters.

The credit for the prevailing peace in this country should be accorded to the people of Uganda who have scorned violence, the religious and traditional leaders who have mediated for ends to senseless conflicts.

President Museveni should not run a campaign premised on falsehood that he is a champion of peace, whereas he is not. After all, what Ugandans enjoy now, is relative peace, as opposed to a well-deserved absolute peace.

Since independence, Uganda has endured senseless conflicts. To an outsider, Uganda is known for producing cruel savages like Idd Amin, and now a new breed of dictators like Museveni who refuses to leave power, even when his continued tenure is evidently a liability to everything Ugandan.

We have not been lucky with leadership in this country. Amin caused us much pain and indignation; Dr. Obote went to the left, and apparently stole 1980 elections. President Museveni has done everything - even in excess - exceeded all, and remained the active ingredient of violence in Uganda.

Mr. Museveni’s violence can be traced back to his student’s days. Since 1965, the president was involved in forming militant organizations: FRONASA, Uganda Patriotic Movement et cetra. All these organizations were premised on ideology of violence as mode of obtaining social transformation. His predominant narratives are hewed with ingredients of violence and destruction.

Once you embark on studying the various posturing or manifestations of Mr. Museveni, you find no grain of peace and peacefulness in his etic views of society. From his justification of violence using theories and anecdotes from revolutionists while at Dar es-Salaam University, to the practical approach of conscripting children into his NRA ranks, this President has been the most active ingredient of violence in Uganda.

In fact, President Museveni spent nearly 25 years of his rule either fighting, or creating situations that could generate conflict so he could fight. Northern Uganda was a war theatre for two decades. There is no land in East and Central Africa where Museveni’s army has not set foot. Everywhere they went, the attendant violence and destruction of such places, like Bor in Southern Sudan, becomes characteristic.

The violence that characterize election years are always reflective. Promises to crash opponents, return to the bush if not elected, commissioning Police and armed atrocities on opponents to instill fear and uncertainty among the populace. President Museveni always wears military attire and poses for pictures while firing his AK47. Such pictures help to reinvent his image and reputation of violence, and to cement that in the psyche of the population that Mr. Violence is still in charge of this country.

The disappearance of Mr. Christopher Aine, and the arrest of many Go-Forward supporters in Ntungamo and the infamous “poking the “something” “something” of the Leopard” are not isolated incidences. The speculation over the death of Mr. Aine is nothing strange, or far from a possibility. One of the sons of Kifefe was martyred in the same way. After all, every part of Uganda has mass graves and heaps of skulls to show for this regime.

Ugandans should be bold and honest to confront this violence by placing it behind us on February 18th, 2016. The real active ingredient of insurgency and violence in this country is Mr. Museveni. This, precisely is the reason the country is so tensed up right now with illegal recruitment of militias.

Lastly, the numerous contradictions that he (Mr. Museveni) is not willing to hand over power when defeated at the polls, only signify a possibility for violence. Any prospects of stealing votes this time using any means, including the Biometric Voters’ Verification System, certainly will plunge Uganda into turmoil. Let’s defy.

END


No comments:

Post a Comment

Peasantry politics and the crisis of allegiance

PEASANTRY POLITICS Recently Hon. Ojara Martin Mapenduzi dominated the national news headlines over his decision to cooperate with the Nation...